African Union: Why granting Israel an observer status is another grave misstep

Tafi Mhaka * / 12 August 2021
Share this story

The AU decision reflects its lengthy support for a two-state solution which has certainly failed the Palestinians and enabled the western-backed Israeli settler-colonial project.

On 22 July, the chairperson of the African Union Commission (AUC) received credentials from the ambassador of the State of Israel to Ethiopia, Burundi, and Chad. 

The moribund two-state solution has long normalised Israeli aggression and the multidimensional dehumanisation of Palestinians

The meeting between Moussa Faki Mahamat and Aleli Admasu, held at the headquarters of the African Union (AU) in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, formally sealed Israel’s observer status at the AU. Israel had previously held observer status at the Organisation of African Unity (OAU), but had failed to get it back after the OAU was disbanded in 2002 and replaced by the AU.

Israeli Foreign Minister Yair Lapid described the event as “a day of celebration for Israel-Africa relations”. However, South Africa described the surprising move as “unjust” and “shocking”. Namibia, meanwhile, said: “granting observer status to an occupying power is contrary to the principles and objectives of the Constitutive Act of the African Union.” Fourteen countries have allegedly rejected Israel’s observer status.

The AUC reportedly decided to grant Israel observer status without consulting all member states. Still, this decision should be seen within the context of the AU’s lengthy support for a two-state solution to the Middle East conflict. Its stated position is clear: Palestinians deserve to have an independent state based on the 4 June 1967 borders.

Two state stalemate 

For nearly 60 years, the AU has said a two-state solution is necessary for the peaceful co-existence of Israel and an independent Palestinian state. Nonetheless, over the years the peace process has repeatedly stalled and a Palestinian state has not materialised. Indeed, the “great” two-state solution has only served to repeatedly “other” Palestinians and enable the western-backed Israeli settler-colonial project.

Each time Israel has attacked Gaza and killed innocent women and children, for example, its western allies have pointed to Israel’s “legitimate right to defend itself” and promptly mentioned the slippery two-state solution.

Each time Israel has imposed on Gaza restrictions that create widespread poverty and hardship, its western allies have alluded to the two-state solution and cited the need to “balance Israel’s security concerns” with Palestinian needs.

And each time Israel has sanctioned new illegal settlements in the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem, that further jeopardise the establishment of a geographically contiguous Palestinian state, in contravention of international law, the EU and US have slapped Israel on the wrist and unashamedly deferred to their support for a two-state solution in generally useless statements. 

‘Both-sidesism’

Today some 600,000-750,000 Israelis live in at least 250 settlements in the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem. So, the bitter reality of the two-state solution in August 2021 is that it has morphed into an endless conduit for colonial expansion amid western complicity.

Despite at least 279 Palestinians being killed in the Israeli war on Gaza, the West Bank, and East Jerusalem in May, for example, the US recently approved a $735m arms sale and a potential $3.4bn helicopters sale to Israel.

Such support is made possible by the “both-sidesism” pushed by western media and political actors to frame a dubious logic and morality to Israel’s systemic discrimination, racism, and violence. But only Palestinians have had to suffer the indignity of tremendous land theft and deprivation under a longstanding occupation and the spectre of a stumbling two-state solution.

A Palestinian girl holds her doll inside her house which was heavily damaged during the latest Israeli-Palestinian fighting, in Gaza City on August 5, 2021.
A Palestinian girl holds her doll inside her house which was heavily damaged during the latest Israeli-Palestinian fighting, in Gaza City on 5 August, 2021 (AFP)

Indeed, only the Palestinians have been let down by their erstwhile comrades indulging the two-state solutions’ “both-sidesism” for selfish ends. Rwanda, Ethiopia, Kenya, and Ghana, for instance, have embraced the rhetoric of the two-state solution to establish close ties with Israel.

To all intents and purposes, many African nations simply doubt the feasibility of the two-state solution and have no problem engaging with Israel on many levels. A two-state solution has certainly failed Palestinians, and AU member states cannot pretend otherwise.

Shameful inaction

The AU must abandon the policy and actively back the establishment of a single democratic state for Palestinians and Israelis. Working towards the establishment of a unitary state would compel the AU to implement a comprehensive review of Israel’s apartheid policies.

Israel has not had to reckon with widespread international action against its many human rights violations, and the AU has been party to that shameful inaction

It would also compel the AU to establish a concrete plan of action to help secure Palestinian land, social and economic rights at present, and in a truly democratic dispensation.

Human Rights Watch, a leading NGO, has described Israel as similar to apartheid South Africa. It certainly is, but Israel has not had to reckon with widespread international action against its many human rights violations, and the AU has been party to that shameful inaction. 

It has not probed why Israel is routinely demolishing Palestinian schools, homes, and villages. Nor why Palestinians in Sheikh Jarrah face imminent eviction from homes they have owned since 1956. Nor why thousands of young Palestinian boys languishing in Israeli military detention are experiencing physical and mental abuse.

It has not probed why Palestinians are subjected to humiliating treatment and execution-style deaths at security checkpoints. Why Israel is building more illegal settlements on occupied land. Why Gaza is a cauldron of human suffering. Or why 5,739 Palestinians lost their lives to needless Israeli violence between 2008 and 2021.

The progressive bloc

These are the matters the AU should be seized with, where Palestinian rights are concerned, but the moribund two-state solution has long normalised Israeli aggression and the multidimensional dehumanisation of Palestinians. 

The establishment of a single democratic state under which Palestinians and Israelis co-exist peacefully as equal beings cannot be beyond the imagination of the AU.

A democratic state that recognises and atones for the many injustices Palestinians have endured for the last 73 years should be the just goal. It’s time for the progressive bloc within the AU to champion a single democracy that would empower Palestinians and Israelis equally. 

The views expressed in this article belong to the author .

* Tafi MhakaTafi Mhaka is a Johannesburg-based commentator and writer with a keen interest in African affairs, with special focus on Zimbabwe and Southern Africa. Tafi has a BA Honours degree from the University of Cape Town. His works have been published on Aljazeera, News24, Nehanda Radio, Newsday, and New Zimbabwe. He tweets at @tafimhaka

SOURCE: Middle East Eye

Last Posts

President Putin announces Easter ceasefire

President of Russia Vladimir Putin announces Easter ceasefire

Share this story

Share this storyDuring a meeting at the Kremlin with the Chief of the General Staff of Russia’s Armed Forces Valery Gerasimov President Vladimir Putin declared that the Russian Side is ceasing all military action starting…

12 August 2021

On April 17, 2025, Russia's Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and the United States Secretary of State Marco Rubio had a telephone conversation

Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov has a phone conversation with his US counterpart, Marco Rubio

Share this story

Share this storyOn April 17, 2025, Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and the United States Secretary of State Marco Rubio had a telephone conversation. Secretary Rubio, who is currently in Paris, informed the Russian side…

12 August 2021

In the first installment of the Two Shores Dialogue series, two journalists — Ma Jiaying from China and Héribert Adjovi from Africa — exchange insights on the pressing issues of our time: rising trade protectionism, the shifting global order, and the long-term consequences of tariff wars. Reflecting on the legacy of the Bandung Conference, they advocate for renewed solidarity among the Global South, grounded in the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence. A powerful, thoughtful dialogue that bridges continents and visions.

Beyond the tariff crisis, it’s time to take a fair look at globalisation… 70 years after the Bandung Conference

Share this story

Share this story‘A LOOK FROM BOTH SIDES’ is first and foremost an interesting Dialogue between two Friends, two eminent Journalists and a crossed vision of two media professionals, one Chinese and the other African (Beninese)…

12 August 2021

South-Africas-Government-of-Natiomall-Unity-on-the-brink-of-collapse-Picture-credit-Malawi-24.

THERE’S A SENSE THAT SA’S GNU IS TEETERING ON THE EDGE COLLAPSE

Share this story

Share this storyBy ABBEY MAKOE By all accounts, South Africa’s conundrum that is the Government of National Unity (GNU) will likely fester into a debilitating wound before it gets healed anytime soon. The revelation of…

12 August 2021

The world has now become irreversibly multipolar, a reality America’s ruling elites are refusing to accept.Photo | Mandar Pardika

US-China trade war: Standing up to the playground bully

Share this story

Share this storyToday’s China is not yesterday’s Soviet Union. Nor is Trump’s America the sole superpower. Anyone trying to push back the clock of history will get hurt https://www.newindianexpress.com/author/sudheendra-kulkarni The global tariff ‘war’ unleashed by…

12 August 2021

Panelists speak during the "Critical Raw Materials in the Age of Competition" session held on the sidelines of the Antalya Diplomacy Forum, in Antalya, Turkiye on April 12, 2025.

Critical raw materials in age of competition discussed at Antalya Diplomacy Forum

Share this story

Share this storyPanel addresses geopolitical, economic, strategic importance of underground resources Sercan Irkin and Zehra Nur Celik  |13.04.2025 – Update : 13.04.2025 ANTALYA, Türkiye The “Critical Raw Materials in the Age of Competition” panel was…

12 August 2021

Related Stories