EU seized on illegality of economic activities in Western Sahara

The Pan Afrikanist Watchman / 27 January 2022

126 Saharawi civil society organizations seized European Union’s high institutions to denounce the illegality of EU’s economic activities and exploitation of natural resources in the occupied zones of Western Sahara, without the consent of the Saharawi people, believing that these activities help perpetuate Moroccan illegal occupation of the last colony in Africa.

The signatories of the letter, representing a broad cross-section of the Saharawi people on Sunday sent a letter to the President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, and the President of the European Council, Charles Michel, to denounce EU’s economic activities and exploitation of natural resources in occupied areas of Western Sahara, drawing attention to inaccuracies in a recent EU report alleging “benifits” of such activities to the people of Western Sahara.

“Such activities are unlawful because they do not meet a threshold of consent nor benefit the Saharawi people, while assisting to perpetuate an illegal occupation, itself an act of aggression that includes efforts to annex Western Sahara,” the organizations wrote in their letter.

In this context, the organizations reaffirmed that “the Saharawi people have exclusive rights to determine their international legal status including to govern economic and resource activities in their territory. We accept this sovereignty is embodied in our elected institutions, including the government of the Saharawi Arab Democratic Republic (SADR) as a full state and founding member of the regional organization, the African Union, and the Frente Polisario as the unique representative of the Saharawi people for matters of self-determination.”

“EU activities that involve Western Sahara – without an active and continuing consent of the Saharawi people conveyed through their representative institutions – contravene the sovereignty which flows to the Saharawi people from Articles 2 and 73 of the UN Charter. Such activities indirectly contribute to the occupying power’s erosion of that sovereignty,” they warned.

Following is the full text of the letter, of which TPA received a copy:

H.E. Charles Michel

President of the European Council European Council

H.E. Ursula von der Leyen

President of the European Commission European Commission

Your Excellencies:

Western Sahara and European Union institutions

A response of Saharawi civil society organizations to exploitation under occupation

23 January 2022

It is our privilege to write to you, expressing the good faith of the Saharawi people at the start of a new year.

We are numerous (126) Saharawi civil society organizations representing a broad cross-section of our people in the Sahrawi refugee camps, the liberated zone of Western Sahara, the diaspora, and in that part of our territory which continues to be occupied.

Our goal in writing is three-fold. First, we consider it necessary to make a fresh public statement denouncing European Union institution economic and natural resource activities which persist in the occupied area of Western Sahara. Second, we wish to call attention to inaccuracies in a recent EU report which alleges the benefits of such activities. Third, we seek to emphasize fundamental principles that apply to the conduct of EU institutions that would be involved with Western Sahara.

Excellencies, we protest EU activities in and treaty-making for Western Sahara in the strongest possible terms. Simply, such activities are unlawful because they do not meet a threshold of consent nor benefit the Saharawi people, while assisting to perpetuate an illegal occupation, itself an act of aggression that includes efforts to annex Western Sahara. We note our protests have extended over many years, recalling the letter of Saharawi civil society organizations to the then EU Commissioner for Trade, Mr. Karel de Gucht, on 26 June 2012.

The basis for our protest is sovereignty, in other words, that the Saharawi people have exclusive rights to determine their international legal status including to govern economic and resource activities in their territory. We accept this sovereignty is embodied in our elected institutions, including the government of the Saharawi Arab Democratic Republic (SADR) as a full state and founding member of the regional organization, the African Union, and the Frente Polisario as the unique representative of the Saharawi people for matters of self-determination.

EU activities that involve Western Sahara – without an active and continuing consent of the Saharawi people conveyed through their representative institutions – contravene the sovereignty which flows to the Saharawi people from Articles 2 and 73 of the UN Charter. Such activities indirectly contribute to the occupying power’s erosion of that sovereignty.

We recall the European Court of Justice in its 2016 and 2018 appeal decisions, and courts such as the South Africa High Court, have confirmed Western Sahara is not part of Morocco.

Second, we wish to comment on the European Commission Staff Working Document “2021 Report on the benefits for the people of Western Sahara on extending tariff preferences to products from Western Sahara” (SWD 431 2021 final) of 22 December 2021. We fear the report will be used to maintain the fiction that EU activities in Western Sahara result in benefit for the Saharawi people.

A first fact to observe about the report is that it makes no mention of that part of the Saharawi population – at law a part of required beneficiaries – who reside in the liberated zone of Western Sahara and at the Sahrawi refugee camps. A claim of benefits to a population under occupation tells only part of the story. A claim to benefits that would include illegally resettled foreign nationals in Western Sahara, meanwhile, is something monstrous and cannot have been intended. It is crucial to distinguish between population and the people of Western Sahara: The people of Western Sahara are the one entity who should be addressed and dealt with, as legitimate sovereigns of the territory. The term population is vague and misleading, suggesting the inclusion of settlers, members of the occupying forces, police and itinerant fishermen, all in Western Sahara contrary to the Fourth Geneva Convention and the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.

As a second fact, we also decry the absence of supporting evidence for what is claimed in the

report. Furthermore, while already noting EU activities to be inimical to the self-determination of the Saharawi people and generally contrary to international humanitarian law, we see that many such activities – especially the ocean fishery – is done with regard or at least reported assessment of environmental degradation. The Saharawi government’s nationally determined contribution (INDC) published at the UNFCCC CoP26 last year is instructive in this regard. What concerns us is that benefit is claimed without mention of the failure to account for adverse environmental impacts, which has been widely documented by environmental NGO and environmental human rights defenders (EHRDS).

A third fact, we next point out, that the data sources seemingly relied on in the making of the report are those of the occupying state Morocco. (See e.g. the purported dialogue between EU institutions and the occupying state at page 30.) A more immediate means of assuring the report to be without credibility would be hard to conceive.

Let us further note the report masks the international legal situation of Western Sahara. Instead, the report directs the reader to an assessment of the “political and human rights situation”. (See page

31.) No mention is made of the settled legal status of Western Sahara after the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice and settled customary international law, and no regard is made for the circumstances of occupation. Of course, these omissions are necessary if one is to avoid concluding EU activities in Western Sahara contribute to the illegal (and criminal, on the part of responsible individuals) presence of an occupying power in the territory.

Let us consider fundamentals. By this, we mean the legal principles that apply to European community and EU institution activities that affect Western Sahara. There are two sources of such obligations. The first is international humanitarian law. In the context of an unlawful occupation, EU institutions must actively refrain from assisting with acts of occupation and annexation, and material contribution to acts such as the war crimes of pillage and population resettlement. Second, in the context of the self- determination of the Saharawi people, there must be an assured continuing benefit – on the basis of free, prior and informed consent – from EU activities. The European Court of Justice has been clear about such requirements in its judgments of 29 September 2021. The fundamental prerequisite of consent of the Saharawi people – again to be expressed through our democratic representative institutions – has never been acceptably sought nor obtained for such activities.

We invite the Council and Commission to:

1. reply to this letter and engage immediately with our representative institutions: The government of the Saharawi Republic and the Frente Polisario; and

2. provide a copy of this letter to the European Court of Justice in any evidence and written submissions during the appeal of the 29 September judgments, above.

Please let us express our gratitude for your consideration of these most vital matters.

We have the honour to convey, Excellencies, the assurance of our highest consideration.

Signature,

Copy to:

H.E. Roberta Metsola

President of the European Parliament European Parliament

Last Posts

President Nicholas Maduro

End the Siege on Venezuela: Let the Venezuelan People Rebuild in Peace

hardship, political pressure and now natural disaster. They deserve respect, not punishment. They deserve solidarity, not coercion. They deserve reconstruction, not occupation. Those who truly care about human rights should demand policies that reduce suffering…

27 January 2022

President of Cuba, Miguel Díaz-Canel

Cuba Must Not Be Punished for Choosing Its Own Path

By Mafa Kwanisai Mafa History has a remarkable way of exposing the contradictions of great powers. Those who speak most loudly about democracy, human rights and the rules-based international order are often the very ones…

27 January 2022

Botswana Vice President and Minister of Finance Hon Ndaba Nkosinathi Gaolathe

Botswana Parliament charts course for stronger law-making through landmark capacity-building seminar

From Moses Magadza in Gaborone, Botswana The Parliament of Botswana has embarked on a drive to strengthen legislative excellence, democratic accountability and evidence-based lawmaking, with parliamentary leaders and regional partners declaring that continuous learning has…

27 January 2022

Foreign Minister Bruno Rodríguez

Cuba: UN to debate blockade on July 7 despite US pressure

Havana (Prensa LatinaNews Agency), Foreign Minister Bruno Rodríguez announced today that Cuba has requested a UN session for July 7 to address the US blockade and denounced Washington’s pressure to prevent the debate. In a…

27 January 2022

Vice Chancellor Prof. David Norris insisted when he joined UB in 2018 that the institution must be subjected to peer review by reputable ranking institutions

University of Botswana Climbs Times Higher Education Impact Rankings on SDG Gains

Gaborone — The University of Botswana (UB) has improved its standing in the Times Higher Education (THE) Impact Rankings 2026, reflecting measurable progress across several Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and underscoring the institution’s expanding role…

27 January 2022

Bruno Rodríguez Parrilla, Cuba’s Minister of Foreign Affairs, highlighted the WFP’s support for Cuba. @BrunoBrunoP

World Food Programme Approves Cooperation with Cuba Despite U.S. Pressure

The Executive Board of the United Nations World Food Programme (WFP) approved the Country Programme for Cuba for the period 2026-2030 with 29 votes in favor and only 2 against. The decision was made at…

27 January 2022

Related Stories